MEV infrastructure development
Every assumption in MEV code is being actively tested by someone with capital and a faster machine. That is why we write it like protocol code rather than like a bot, and why we care as much about what happens on a bad block as on a good one.
Why this work is different
MEV is the only part of a stack where the adversary is a rational, funded participant reading the same mempool you are. Code that merely works in a backtest loses money the week it ships, because the conditions it was tested against are the ones your competitors have already moved past.
It is also deep, chain-native work. Mempool mechanics, transaction ordering, gas markets, and client internals. It is the layer most engineering shops route around, and the one we take on directly.
How we work
Everything is simulated against historical mempool data and known extractive strategies before it touches real value, so its behaviour is measured rather than assumed. Protection modelled on how searchers are supposed to behave is not protection.
We integrate at the protocol level with Flashbots, MEV-Boost, and private orderflow relays rather than through a single vendor SDK, so the system stays portable across builders and relays instead of inheriting someone else's roadmap.
What that means we build
Searcher infrastructure. Bundle construction and simulation, arbitrage and liquidation pipelines, and the latency-critical path from mempool signal to submitted bundle.
MEV protection. Sandwich-attack simulation, slippage and priority-fee modelling, and routing that keeps user and protocol value out of reach of extractive strategies.
Common questions
- Do you build searcher bots or MEV protection?
- Both. The same understanding of mempool mechanics that lets you extract value lets you defend against extraction. We build searcher bundle pipelines as well as sandwich-attack protection and MEV-aware routing for protocols and users.
- Which relays and infrastructure do you integrate with?
- Flashbots, MEV-Boost, and private orderflow relays, plus direct mempool ingestion. We integrate at the protocol level rather than through a single vendor SDK, so the system stays portable across builders and relays.
- Can MEV protection be simulated before it ships?
- Yes, and it should be. We simulate protection against historical mempool data and known extractive strategies (sandwiching, backrunning, JIT liquidity) so its behaviour is measured, not assumed, before it protects real value.
Have something hard to build?
Tell us the hard part: the protocol, the client, the mechanism, or the system that has to hold.